Adorno:
Adorno proposed that popular culture is akin to a factory producing
standardized cultural goods— films, radio programmes, magazines, etc. — that
are used to manipulate mass society into passivity. Consumption of the easy
pleasures of popular culture, made available by the mass communications media,
renders people docile and content, no matter how difficult their economic
circumstances. He believed that the inherent danger of the culture industry is
the cultivation of false psychological needs that can only be met and satisfied
by the products of capitalism, and that rue psychological needs are freedom,
creativity, and genuine happiness. So in this day and age, Adorno would assume
listening to pop music would be wouldn’t be educative.
Hebdige:
Hebdige disagreed with Adorno. He believed Adorno’s view was cynical and
flippant of mass audiences as inactive and effortlessly manipulated. He argued
back that when people are listening to music, they are aware and active;
however, an audience’s social and ethical beliefs and backgrounds lead to diverse
interpretations of the same product.
Because R&B ballads are usually very narrative
and expressive, I believe my subculture conforms more too Hebdige's argument.
People understand the same product/song in different ways due to their
different backgrounds. For example, I enjoy the song 'Runaway Love' by Ludacris
feat. Mary J. I enjoy is because I sympathise with it. However, I do not relate
to it because I have never been abused or lived through any hardship, but
somebody else who has experienced these things will relate to and understand
the song differently to me.
This post is too similar to what is written on the wiki site. As before the exam board will disqualify you for this as you have not cited your source but presented it as your own. Change this please and either quote form websites - although wiki is not a relaible academic source - or write ir wholly using your own words to show your understanding.
ReplyDelete